LAW.coLAW.co

SUDHARMI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Haitham S. SADEQ; Rola A. Sabbagh, Defendants-Appellants

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2002-06-11No. No. 02-1006
36 F. App'x 514

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER curiam:.

Haitham S. Sadeq and Rola A. Sabbagh appeal the magistrate judge’s order awarding judgment in favor of Appellee in this action filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act. We have reviewed the magistrate judge’s opinion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Sudharmi v. Sadeq, No. CA-00-1451A (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).