LAW.coLAW.co

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RUDOLPH F. HARNED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1906-06-18
73 N.J.L. 681

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12.

For reversal — None.