CHARLES La BETT, APPELLANT, v. HEYMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 10. For reversal — N one.