CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.