LAW.coLAW.co

John Dimler, complainant-appellant, v. Caroline Caldwell et al., defendants-respondents

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1917-03-05
87 N.J. Eq. 366

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

So far as concerns the title to the property we agree with Vice-Chancellor Emery and the chancellor. So far as the decree adjudges that the complainant is entitled to a lien for $750 and interest, we have assumed its correctness, since there is no appeal by the defendants from that part of tire decree, and the complainant is not aggrieved thereby. The decree is affirmed, with costs. For affirmance—Ti-ib Ci-iiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trejstohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—12.

For reversal—None.