LAW.coLAW.co

WOOTTON HOTEL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS B. WOOTTON AND REBA F. WOOTTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1937-04-30
118 N.J.L. 185

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the trial judge that the defendants failed to disclose facts which entitle them to defend. It was proper that the answer with its separate defenses should be stricken and that summary judgment for possession should be entered for the plaintiff. Judgment below will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.