LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. VINCENZO PISCITELLI ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1937-04-30
118 N.J.L. 182

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.