PER CURIAM:
Robert J. Riccio appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in Riccio’s action alleging wrongful termination in violation of Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101—12213 (2000). To establish a prima facie case of discriminatory firing under the ADA, a plaintiff must show that: (1) he has a disability; (2) he is otherwise qualified for the job in question; and (3) he was discharged because of his disability. Baird v. Rose, 192 F.3d 462, 467-70 (4th Cir.1999). We agree with the district court that Riccio failed to establish that he was “otherwise qualified” for the position from which he was terminated. See 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8) (defining “qualified individual with a disability”); Myers v. Hose, 50 F.3d 278, 281-82 (4th Cir.1995) (applying two-prong analysis for determining whether a person is “an otherwise qualified individual”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED