LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES CAPAWANNA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Supreme Court1938-01-26
119 N.J.L. 337

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in its opinion. We reserve, however, and do not pass upon, the question of whether the admission in evidence of a certain X-ray photograph was error. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.