William P. HALEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKES PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; Randolph Nichols, Doctor, Superintendent of the Chesapeake Public Schools; James S. Gilmore, III, Governor of Virginia; Mark L. Earley, Attorney General of Virginia; Wilbert Bryant, Virginias Secretary of Education; Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education; Commonwealth of Virginia; Jo Lynne Demary, State Superintendent of Public Instruction; United States of America; Bill Clinton, President of the United States of America; Richard W. Riley, Americas Secretary of Education; Janet Reno, Attorney General of America; City of Chesapeake, Virginia; William Ward, Chesapeakes Mayor; Ronald Hallman, Chesapeake City Attorney; John L. Pazour, City Manager of Chesapeake, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-03-27No. No. 00-2491

6 F. App'x 171

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

William P. Haley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haley v. Chesapeake’s Public School Sys., No. CA-00-520-2 (E.D.Va. filed Nov. 9, 2000; entered Nov. 13, 2000). We deny as moot Haley’s motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.