LEWIS against ALBERTSON

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— The reason relied upon, for reversal of this judgment at bar, was the imperfection [74] and insufficiency of the account filed. Upon inspection it seems to me, to be perfectly intelligible. Besides, the defendant appeared and went to trial upon it. I am for an affirmance of the judgment.

Rossell, J. — Concurred.

Pennington, J.

— I concur in affirming this judgment. The state of demand contains a plain charge for wood sold, not very skillfully made out, but that is not required. Judgment affirmed.