LAW.coLAW.co

JACOB KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK EPSTEIN, TRADING AS CENTURY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1939-01-13
121 N.J.L. 534

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.