PER CURIAM.
Michael Scott McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny McRae’s motion for further production of transcripts, and dismiss the appeal largely on the reasoning of the district court. McRae v. French, No. CA-98-875-5-F-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2000).
In an argument not addressed by the district court, McRae asserts that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on intent, effectively creating a mandatory presumption and relieving the State of its burden of proof. Review of the record reveals that this assertion is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this claim as well. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.