LAW.coLAW.co

ABRAHAM FISCHMAN, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH FISH HAT COMPANY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1939-04-21
122 N.J.L. 428

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Paekee, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Hague, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.