LAW.coLAW.co

STATE EX REL. CLIFFORD L. HILTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. A. J. VAN BUSKIRK

Minnesota Supreme Court1923-10-26No. No. 23,795
157 Minn. 23

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in State ex rel. v. Essling, supra, page 15, the motion of the respondent to quash the writ of quo warranto issued in the above entitled proceeding must be granted, and it is accordingly ordered that such writ be and the same hereby is quashed.