LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saeb Abdel Majid DABBAS, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2001-02-23No. No. 00-50487; D.C. No. CR-00-45-RAP
4 F. App'x 519

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Saeb Abdel Majid Dabbas appeals the judgment of conviction and his 37 month sentence following his guilty plea to unlaw ful reentry of a deported alien. Dabbas contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) because the government neither pled in the indictment nor established through the guilty plea that Dabbas had been deported subsequent to a prior conviction for an aggravated felony. Dabbas also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb.8, 2001) (order).

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.