LAW.coLAW.co

Sandra DANIELS; Timothy Marsolf, Lead Relator and on behalf of all relators; Gary Haugen; George C. Stone; Terry L. Perkins; William W. McCoy, Jr.; John T. Davis; Tod J. Callahan; Shawn M. Newcomb; William J. Adams; David R. Taylor; David L. Robins; Teddy G. Dummire; David E. Hart; Clayton L. Howard; David W. Tribett, Plaintiffs, and Keith Christenson; Robert W. Johnston; Neil D. Pake; Scott R. Smith; David R. Durham; Robert A. Collins; Mark S. Huesser; Richard Grooms; Terry J. Staley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill COGSWELL; Ira Blalock; Elizabeth Browne; Chalmers Jones; Elizabeth L. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2001-02-23No. No. 00-35299; D.C. No. CV-79-0651-HA
4 F. App'x 524

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Nine Oregon state prisoners appeal pro se the district court’s order denying their various post-judgment motions, including motions to reactivate a 1979 judgment to bring in new claims. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order filed on February 17, 2000.

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.