LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Osvaldo ROLDAN-PALACIOS, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2001-02-22No. No. 00-10438; D.C. No. CR-00-00079-ACK
4 F. App'x 457

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Omar Osvaldo Roldan-Palacios appeals the judgment of conviction and his 46 month sentence following his guilty plea to a single count of being a deported alien found in the U.S. in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Roldan-Palacios contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) on the basis of a prior conviction for an aggravated felony that was not charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Roldan-Palacios also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb.8, 2001) (order).

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.