LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH LINARDUCCI, Jr., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Supreme Court1939-09-22
123 N.J.L. 228

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12. For reversal — Hone.