Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court and reported in 123 N. J. L. 497. For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.