LAW.coLAW.co

In the Matter of Kenneth R. GROSS, Petition for Reinstatement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania2002-04-19No. No. 49 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
568 Pa. 241795 A.2d 375

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated February 25, 2002, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. ■ Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would, at a minimum, adopt the recommendation of the Hearing Committee that an independent auditor audit petitioner’s handling of client funds for a period of three years and submit a report to the Board.