LAW.coLAW.co

Charles Michael MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chief AUSTIN; Paul Mead, and all other concerned parties of the Columbia City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-02-20No. No. 00-7169
3 F. App'x 162

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Michael Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion agreeing with the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment to the Appellees and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Austin, No. CA-99-1620-0-23BD (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Appellees are Charles Austin, Chief of Police for the City of Columbia, South Carolina, and Paul Mead, an investigator with the Columbia City Police Department.