LAW.coLAW.co

Searing against Lum

New Jersey Supreme Court1819-09
5 N.J.L. 683

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

By the court

The justice has acted very incorrectly in altering his record after it was made up, and a copy given to the party. Such conduct deserves reprehension and punishment. He also erred in his exposition of the law, and his judgment must, therefore, be reversed.