PER CURIAM.
Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodson, Nos. CR-94-79; CA-99-218-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.