LAW.coLAW.co

JANE MAX ET AL., INFANTS, ETC., RESPONDENTS, v. R. ROBERT MAX, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1940-10-10
125 N.J.L. 271

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion deliveredby Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Bodine, Pbeskie, Deae, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Case, Hbhee, Wells, Hague, JJ. 4.