PER CURIAM:
Ricky Darden seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his “Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) & (6)” as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2002) motion and dismissing it as successive. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Darden, Nos. CR-93-447-PJM; CA-02-534-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.