LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. BERNARD KATZ, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1925-10-19
102 N.J.L. 224

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.