LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM MALAY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1925-09-10
102 N.J.L. 225

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the Supreme Court. For affirmanee — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.