LAW.coLAW.co

William E. Ten Broeck and Emma Jane Jackson, appellants, v. Charles A. Jackson, executor, &c., et al., respondents

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1908-03-02
73 N.J. Eq. 734

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the learned vice-chancellor correctly held that the essential allegations upon which depended the right of the complainants to relief were not supported by satisfactory evidence. We have not found it necessary to consider the question of laches.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint should be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 13. For reversal — None.