LAW.coLAW.co

E. & M. LAND COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1927-01-31
103 N.J.L. 487

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee. Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Charcellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.