LAW.coLAW.co

E. & M. LAND COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1927-01-31
103 N.J.L. 487

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12. For reversal — if one.