LAW.coLAW.co

WILLIAM T. NEWBURY, APPELLANT, v. RULIFF V. LAWRENCE, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1926-09-16
103 N.J.L. 199

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per. Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11. For reversal — Hone.