LAW.coLAW.co

Joseph J. Hartman, complainant and respondent, v. Anna M. Hartman, defendant and appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1908-11-16
74 N.J. Eq. 851

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed. The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal — None.