LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Byron Scott SAUL, Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit2001-06-12No. No. 00-2809
11 F. App'x 694

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Byron Scott Saul pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and was sentenced to 96 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s imposition of an enhancement for using the firearm in connection with another felony, and the court’s assessment of his criminal history.

We first conclude that the district court did not clearly err in applying the enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5). See United States v. Rohwedder, 243 F.3d 423, 428 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review). The evidence presented at sentencing supported the court’s conclusion that Saul’s conduct satisfied the elements of the Nebraska felony of terroristic threats. See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-311.01 (1995); State v. Tillman, 1 Neb. App. 585, 511 N.W.2d 128, 134 (1993).

Second, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in assessing criminal history points for a 1981 theft conviction. See United States v. Levi, 229 F.3d 677, 679 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review). The evidence presented at sentencing supported the court’s determination that, within fifteen years of the date of his commission of the instant offense, Saul was serving a parole-revocation sentence arising from the theft conviction. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e)(1) and (k)(2)(B).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

. The Honorable William G. Cambridge, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, now retired.