PER CURIAM.
Nicholas Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint, and a subsequent order denying as moot his motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Dusing, No. CA-00-1644-L (D.Md. filed Feb. 14, 2001, entered Feb. 15, 2001; filed Feb. 21, 2001, entered Feb. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.