HARRY MICHLER, RESPONDENT, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.