LAW.coLAW.co

JOHN P. WALSH, APPELLANT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1927-10-17
104 N.J.L. 207

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.