LAW.coLAW.co

WILLIAM KATZ, APPELLANT, v. ESSEX SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1927-10-17
104 N.J.L. 174

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Paricer, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12. For reversal — Hone.