IRWIN K. GIRDEN, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREW THOMPSON ET AL., APPELLANT

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — -Paekee, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.