LAW.coLAW.co

MARGARET WILLIAMS ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1928-10-15
105 N.J.L. 259

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Tbenchaed, Pakkeb, Mintuen, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Yak Buskibk, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deab, JJ. 11. For reversal — -Hone.