LAW.coLAW.co

OGORMAN & YOUNG, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, OF LONDON, A CORPORATION OF GREAT BRITAIN, RESPONDENT; OGORMAN & YOUNG, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1929-05-20
105 N.J.L. 642

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 8. For reversal — Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskiek, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 6.