LAW.coLAW.co

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ROBERT McGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1928-06-22
105 N.J.L. 251

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per euriam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, White, Yan Buskirk, MgGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 9. For reversal — None.