LAW.coLAW.co

Golden v. The State

Supreme Court of Georgia1934-11-17No. No. 10381
179 Ga. 767

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to support the verdict. There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices cononr, except Russell, G. J., and Sutcheson, J., who dissent.

■ M. J. Yeomans, allorney-general, W. O. Forehand, solicitor-geneneral, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant attorneys-general, Philip Newbern, and Levy Rogers, contra.