LAW.coLAW.co

WILLIAM DEFFUR ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL J. TANSEY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1930-02-03
106 N.J.L. 236

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam. •

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 11. For reversal — Hone.