NORMAN MELLOR, TRADING AS ARGUTO OILLESS BEARING CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. EDWARD V. HARTFORD, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiek, McGlennon, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10. For reversal — Paekee, Kays, JJ. 2.