LOUISE P. HARING ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES W. BANKS, APPELLANT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellob, Tbenchaed, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yah Buskiek, McGlehhoh, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.