LAW.coLAW.co

Columbia Insurance Company, complainant-respondent, v. Emanuel Artale, Mamie Artale and Joseph T. Lieblich, defendants-appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
114 N.J. Eq. 268

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion below.

We express no opinion upon the propriety of the award to appellant Lieblich, of a lien on the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises, for attorney’s services rendered to his co-appellants, Emanuel Artale and Mamie Artale. The latter have not raised the. question, and it is therefore not before us. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -Hone.