LAW.coLAW.co

Bradham v. The State

Supreme Court of Georgia1935-01-19No. No. 10455
180 Ga. 187

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Bell, Justice.

1. The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the charge on the subject of conspiracy, and to authorize the verdict of guilty. 2. The groundsof the motion for a new trial relating to other questions, not being referred to in the briefs for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned. 3. The judgment refusing a new trial was not erroneous for any reason urged.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices ooneur, except Russell, C. J., and Atkinson, J., who dissent.