LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ADOLPH KATZ, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Supreme Court1930-05-19
107 N.J.L. 196

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetmeld, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.