LAW.coLAW.co

PAUL BENCSKO, RESPONDENT, v. CAESAR A. CANNARA, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1931-02-02
107 N.J.L. 516

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodijste, Daly, Dohges, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.